<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enough with the Jackass-ery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/</link>
	<description>programming blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: taybin</title>
		<link>http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>taybin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Meh.  I don't blame the guy for grabbing onto the iPhone hype to get his point across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.  I don&#8217;t blame the guy for grabbing onto the iPhone hype to get his point across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penguinsounds.org/2007/07/15/enough-with-the-jackass-ery/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>The 'jackass' part isn't because he said to invest instead of buying an electronic device. It was because of the way it singled out Apple.

Imagine the headline: "Ford Cars Contribute to Global Warming"

Well, they sure do burn fosil fuels, but is that a fair article to publish? Would you think that article wouldn't (or shouldn't) be critisized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;jackass&#8217; part isn&#8217;t because he said to invest instead of buying an electronic device. It was because of the way it singled out Apple.</p>
<p>Imagine the headline: &#8220;Ford Cars Contribute to Global Warming&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, they sure do burn fosil fuels, but is that a fair article to publish? Would you think that article wouldn&#8217;t (or shouldn&#8217;t) be critisized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
